Simplified Orthodontics Studio العربية
  1. Home
  2. Articles
  3. Cephalometric landmarks

Cephalometric landmarks explained: the main points and reference lines

Key points

  • A cephalometric landmark is a point placed on a lateral cephalogram at a defined anatomical site. Every angle and distance in an analysis is measured from these points.
  • Most analyses share a core set: S, N, Po, Or, ANS, PNS, A, B, Pog, Gn, Me and Go.
  • Lines through these points, such as SN, FH, Go-Gn and the occlusal plane, are the references the readings are measured against.
  • Moving one point by 1 mm can change an angle by about 1°, and every reading that uses the point changes with it.
  • The same name does not always mean the same definition. A reading should be compared with norms that used the same points.

What a cephalometric landmark is

A cephalometric analysis turns a lateral cephalogram into numbers. It does this through landmarks: points placed on the image at defined sites [1]. Angles and distances are then measured between the points, or between lines drawn through them. A tracing is only as good as its points.

Landmarks fall into three broad groups, and the group tells you how a point can go wrong:

Schematic lateral cephalometric tracing facing right, with the points S, N, Po, Or, ANS, PNS, A, B, Pog, Gn, Me and Go, and the lines SN, FH, the palatal plane, the occlusal plane and Go-Gn. S N Po Or ANS PNS A B Pog Gn Me Go SN FH Palatal plane Occlusal plane Go-Gn
Figure 1. The main landmarks and reference lines on a lateral tracing, facing right. Dashed: the palatal and occlusal planes. A schematic drawing, not a tracing of a patient.

Cranial base and orientation points

Maxillary points

Mandibular points

Steiner noted that gonion and gnathion are hard to locate [2]. Both sit on curved outlines with no sharp feature to aim at.

LandmarkRegionKind of point
SCranial baseCentre of a structure, by eye
NCranial baseOn a structure (the suture)
PoCranial baseBy direction (highest point); paired
OrOrbitBy direction (lowest point); paired
ANS, PNSMaxillaOn a structure (spine tips)
AMaxillaBy direction (deepest point)
BMandibleBy direction (deepest point)
PogMandibleBy direction (most anterior point)
GnMandibleBy direction or constructed, depending on the definition
MeMandibleBy direction (lowest point)
GoMandibleOften constructed from two tangents; paired

“Paired” means the structure exists on the left and the right side, so the radiograph can show two outlines.

Reference lines

Worked example: what 1 mm does

The tracing in Figure 1 gives SNA 83.1°, SNB 80.1° and ANB 3.0°, Go-Gn at 27.9° to SN and Go-Me at 24.5° to FH. The table shows what happens when one point is moved by 1 mm and every other point stays where it is. The positions are schematic; they are not from a patient.

Point moved 1 mmSNASNBANBGo-Gn to SNGo-Me to FH
None (Figure 1)83.1°80.1°3.0°27.9°24.5°
N forward82.2°79.6°2.6°27.8°24.5°
A forward84.1°80.1°4.0°27.9°24.5°
Go up83.1°80.1°3.0°28.6°25.2°
Or up83.1°80.1°3.0°27.9°25.2°
Po up83.1°80.1°3.0°27.9°23.8°
  1. Moving nasion forward lowers SNA, SNB and ANB, although neither jaw has moved. Hussels and Nanda showed that ANB changes with the front-to-back position of nasion [6].
  2. Moving A point forward changes SNA and ANB by a full degree each. SNB does not change.
  3. Moving gonion up tilts the mandibular plane. Both mandibular plane angles change, but none of the SN angles to the jaws.
  4. Moving orbitale or porion changes FH, and with it every reading measured from FH, in opposite directions for the two points.

So a small error in one point does not stay small or local. It moves every reading that uses that point or a line through it.

Common sources of identification error

Two outlines of the angle of the mandible, one for each side, slightly apart. Gonion is marked on each, and the midpoint between the two is circled. One side Other side Go: midpoint
Figure 2. The angle of the mandible shown twice, once for each side, as a lateral cephalogram often shows it. One way to place gonion is to mark the midpoint between the two outlines. A schematic drawing.

Placing each point at a comfortable zoom, using the same definitions every time, and tracing a few films again after a while to see how far your own points move, all help to keep this error visible [9].

Do this in Simplified Ceph

Simplified Ceph lets you trace a lateral cephalogram on screen. Calibrate it on the film ruler, pick an analysis, and the landmark list shows only the points it uses, each with a short definition. A loupe and arrow keys help you place each point, and the readings update as you move it. There is a Free plan for lateral cephalometric analysis.

Educational content for clinicians and students. Landmark definitions vary between analyses. This page does not replace clinical judgement.

References

  1. Jacobson A, Jacobson RL, eds. Radiographic Cephalometry: From Basics to 3-D Imaging. 2nd ed. Chicago: Quintessence; 2006. ISBN 978-0-86715-461-0.
  2. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics in clinical practice. Angle Orthod. 1959;29(1):8-29. Publisher’s page
  3. Riedel RA. The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion. Angle Orthod. 1952;22(3):142-145. doi:10.1043/0003-3219(1952)022<0142:TROMST>2.0.CO;2.
  4. Downs WB. Variations in facial relationships: their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod. 1948;34(10):812-840.
  5. Jacobson A. The “Wits” appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod. 1975;67(2):125-38. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(75)90065-2. PMID: 1054214
  6. Hussels W, Nanda RS. Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB. Am J Orthod. 1984;85(5):411-23. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(84)90162-3. PMID: 6586080
  7. Cook PA, Gravely JF. Tracing error with Björk’s mandibular structures. Angle Orthod. 1988;58(2):169-178. doi:10.1043/0003-3219(1988)058<0169:TEWBMS>2.0.CO;2.
  8. Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod. 1971;60(2):111-127. PMID: 5283996.
  9. Houston WJB. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod. 1983;83(5):382-390. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(83)90322-6.

More to read